If you think that the music was a drone then you have no idea whatsoever as to that which you're complaining about. Drone music is a particular genre of music and sounds nothing like the music in the video.
Tuesday, May 8th, 2018 on Selfie
I don't know why the complaints. Also, the music was neither repetitive nor droning. It had a progressive melody and a beat. That hardly qualifies as a drone or stupid for that matter. More to the point, my volume control works perfectly well, although I didn't need to use it. The good news is that Sarika's sexy video wasn't adversely affected in any way by the music. She was as wonderful to look at as always!
Monday, May 7th, 2018 on A Juicy Start
So true! What's really bad is when you can't get off and you keep trying until you realize that you fell asleep and just woke up and then you have to start all over again!!!!! :)
Saturday, April 28th, 2018 on Digression
Wrong! WRONG! Porn has no purpose except to sexually excite the viewer which typically leads to wanking or sex with a partner(s)! Otherwise, what's the point? People don't collect porn like Baseball cards, art or coins. Porn rarely increases in value and only the very rare ancient items are in demand anyway.
I'm absolutely certain that the majority of people watch porn to get sexually excited with the intent to 'wank off' or to have sex with a partner(s) unless they are physically/emotionally incapable of having sex. The very nature of porn has never been for casual entertainment. It's always about sexually enticing the viewer to participate! Porn fails if it isn't sexually exciting!
The sad fact is that most of the porn I've seen is terrible but some of it still gets a lot of people off. So, that which makes porn successful is rather subjective. And much of it has to do with fetishes.
That's why it's been considered TABOO since way before I was born! Mainstream movies add sexual content and nudity for realism and shock value NOT to sexually entice the viewer. The actual sex act in the majority of mainstream films is typically glossed over or quickly fades-to-black. Titillation is rarely the point with rare exception like those of a teen sex romp/comedy or something akin to Fifty Shades of Grey! And that's why porn exists. It fills in the blanks that are otherwise TABOO. Does anybody actually think that we'll see a 'fisting' scene in a mainstream movie? NEVER! It's all left up to the imagination....
I doubt people are paying premium site membership fees just to 'read the articles' as many Playboy subscribers have claimed. So, I don't buy your inference that "Porn could have a similar idea, concept and quality, as any mainstream movies..." That's utter BS! And like a boat full of holes it doesn't float!
A very enjoyable video. Delicious model. Lovely face and body!
Wednesday, April 25th, 2018 on Voyageur
I never thought that I'd say it, but the photo set was much better than the video. Not enough full body views in the vid. And if we did get a good view of her in her entirety it was short lived. My libido is left wanting!
Plus, the model is stunning but the constant motion sickness inducing 'flybys' and rapid close-up and cut away shots aren't enticing enough to pique my interest. And that's annoying!
I really would like to fire 90% of the camera people because they think that they're the stars rather than the model that they're presenting. A tripod could do their job better and more efficiently.
The photographer's duty is to relax the model and to encourage her to pose provocatively, to tease us, to emote sensually, to entice us with her sexuality. She should do most of the moving while the camera person makes minor adjustments to keep her framed properly and in focus. I don't care how many different angles he/she can cram into a 10 minute video!
He or she should capture the best angle/angles to delight the viewer. The camera person should appreciate why we, as viewers, watch these videos in the first place.... Hint: it's not to enjoy the camera person's skills or artistic antics!
Sunday, April 22nd, 2018 on In Glass 2
I really have a hard time enjoying many of these beautiful models and their performances. Here's why:
Why must these so-called professional photographers persist in cramming a hundred different angles into an eleven minute shoot? Yes, it's not still photography, but the camera doesn't have to move all the time! Get a tripod! I enjoy seeing the whole model NOT JUST PARTS AND PIECES! "There's a lovely pose let's see how I can ruin it by moving all around or panning left and right constantly to make the viewer sea sick. After all it's called a movie!" It's NOT a sin to let the camera's eye take in the model's beauty and just linger awhile so that the viewer can enjoy her body for more than 5 seconds at a time and -- wait for it -- NOT zoom in a dozen times as if we've never seen a close-up tit, navel or a pussy before!
Wednesday, April 4th, 2018 on Mystic Beauty 2
Jasmine Jazz and Ibiza -- two names synonymous with unearthly beauty!
Monday, April 2nd, 2018 on Ibiza Part II
We get it. People have different opinions, and you needed to illustrate it ... why?
To me an unkempt pussy is more of a hygiene issue. Whether medically correct, real or imagined it's still unsanitary to me and I stand by my wooden intolerance to think that it looks nasty.
Wednesday, March 21st, 2018 on Black Lingerie
As usual the camera person ruins a great model shoot. STOP DRINKING TOO MUCH COFFEE BEFORE THE SHOOT! Yes, it's called a movie but that doesn't mean that the camera must move! You don't need to impress us with how many camera angles you can cram into a 12 minute shoot. Hint: use a tripod. Put the camera on the tripod and resist touching it! No zooming in and out like you're having a stroke. No panning around the room to showcase the furniture! Let the girl do the moving -- that's her job! Too many sexy scenes are ruined because the camera angle changes the moment my eyes begin to focus on the model's loveliness....
Wednesday, March 21st, 2018 on Bring It To The Table
As i see, you're well-experienced about it. :) But i have bad news for you. I never wrote, that i'm not wank over to porn. Anyway, what if i like movies, and i can separate visual or artistic experiences from desire? ...
Sunday, April 29th, 2018 on Digression
"Porn has no purpose except to sexually excite the viewer which typically leads to wanking or sex with a partner(s)!"
With your way of thinking this sentence could look also like this; music has no purpose except to entertain the listener by hearing which tipically leads to dancing and jumping around. Or; mainstream movies have no purpose except to visually entertain the viewer which tipically leads to staring and to get relaxed. To be honest, all this is halfway true, just like your line. I think, it's mainly the question of ages and/or demands. Porn had a glorious evolution from the 1920s to the 1970s, and has experianced a breakdown in the mid-eighties and during the ninetees, if we talk about movies. With the coming of the millenium the internet has brought the worst form ever of porn. There are hundreds or thousands of thumbnail sites for free, highlight the most shocking or exciting seconds. There are many, who run their own channels and sell themselves for free. This obviously leads to impairment or to burn-out. You might have thought about it when you wrote "The sad fact is that most of the porn I've seen is terrible..." And those who were born in the ninetees, probably have grown up on this. MetArt, Femjoy, Petter Hegre and some others have brought a new vision to porn and erotica. I think, music has many faces and movies also have many faces and anyone can choose the most appealing one. The reason porn has become a taboo or has always been, I think is to be found in religious roots.
"Porn fails if it isn't sexually exciting!"
I totally agree with you on this. But who says, what is exciting and what isn't? Something, what is exciting for you can be disturbing for somebody else. And vice versa. If you read my lines carefully, you can see, that i always write my point of view opposed to you, who mostly just declares. What if you mainly like to get off to porn, and i like to enjoy it from its artistic side - like the mainstream movies or music - and sometimes i like to get off to it?
By the way, i collect porn and mainstream movies and music and books and magazines. I pay premium site membership exactly because of its high value, which distinguishes it from the vast majority.
I strongly recommend you the following porn movies without classifying your words; "The Opening Of Misty Beethoven" (1976), "Sexworld" (1978), "Overnight Sensation" (1976), "Desires Within Young Girls" (1977). Four reasons, plus SexArt of MetArt Network prove, that porn could have a similar idea, concept and quality, as any mainstram movies.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2018 metartx.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.